Blog... Blog... Blog...
I was hoping for at least a few surprises with this year's Oscar nominations, but I never expected this. There are shockers and snubs in every major category - some good and some not so good:
- I'm very happy that "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" got a Best Picture nom. Most thought it didn't have a chance, but the timing of it's wide Jan. release and current buzz pushed it passed other candidates such as "The Ides of March".
- Mixed emotions with the Best Animated category. Glad the Academy stuck to it's policy on Motion Capture, which kept "The Adventures of Tintin" out. And happy for DreamWorks, which hit the Daily Double with "Kung Fu Panda 2" and "Puss in Boots". But no "Cars 2"? No "Arthur Christmas" (one of the best reviewed films of the year). "Rango" is probably the favorite, but with little seen nominees "A Cat in Paris" and Chico and Rita" making the cut anything could happen.
- Shocked that Steven Spielberg didn't get a Best Director nomination, especially with the "Tintin" decision. Yet, "War Horse" makes it into the Best Picture group. ?
- Disappointed that "Buck" was denied a Best Documentary nomination.
- As for the acting categories, every one had a surprise that meant a snub or two:
- Best Actor: Demain Bichir "in", Michael Fassbender, Leonardo DiCaprio "out"
- Best Actress: Rooney Mara "in", Tilda Swinton "out"
- Supporting Actor: Max von Sydow "in", Albert Brooks "out"
- Supporting Actress: Melissa McCarthy "in", Shailene Woodley "out"
I'm happy for von Sydow, and disappointed for Woodley. But the king of the "outs" this year is Ryan Gosling, who didn't get nominated for either of his major roles, while many thought he might get "in" for both.
- Stunned that there are only two nominees in the Best Song category. The problem appears to be that there were simply too many in the pool (39) and the vote was so spread-out. At least "The Muppets" got a little love with "Man or Muppet", but that's probably the 4th best song in the movie.
- Finally, the fact that "Hugo" leads all films with 11 nominations discouraging, since it's not a great film. Early prediction: "The Artist" (2nd with 10 nominations) will win more statues than "Hugo" come Oscar night.
In Theaters
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (PG-13) B+
"Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" deals with a very difficult subject: the attacks of 9/11. But this film is much more than that. It's also a story about journeys and taking risks, dealing with grief and moving forward.
14 year-old Thomas Horn was chosen to play young Oskar Schell, the main character of the story, by director Stephen Daldry when he saw Horn competing on "Kids Jeopardy". And Horn is excellent in this very challenging role, which required him to deliver a tremendous amount of dialogue and raw emotion in practically every single scene.
Oskar is very smart but he also has issues with anxiety and socialization. His father (played by Tom Hanks) knew how to get the best out of his son. They loved to play word games and he would send Oskar on adventures throughout NYC that would force him to use his mind and talk with people. When his father dies in the World Trade Center attacks, Oskar and his mother (Sandra Bullock) are devastated, unable to make sense out of what happened.
A year later, while in his father closet, Oskar finds a key that he believes his father left him as part of a final adventure. So he begins a quest to find the lock that goes with the key, hoping what's inside will provide some answers. Along the way Oskar meets many people, some who change his life as he does theirs.
"Extremely Loud and Incredible Close" is based on a novel which went much more into the details of the 9/11 attacks. For his film Daldry has simplified things. This is Oskar's story: a young boy trying, in his own way, to deal with the sudden loss of his father. But the script and the performances make it work. The film is over 2-hours long, but you stay with it the entire time. Solid supporting performances from Max Von Sydow and Viola Davis compliment the work of Horn, Bullock and Hanks, who is only in a handful of scenes.
As has been the trend with many end of the year releases (including "J. Edgar" and "The Iron Lady"), flashbacks are used extensively, as we see (and hear, in heart-breaking phone messages) the events of 9/11 as they are happening, in bits-and-pieces, throughout the movie. By the end we get the full story of that day for this family, and it helps make for a believable conclusion. The flashback clips help build to a suspenseful climax as Oskar's quest with the key is also coming to an end.
"Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" is rated PG-13, mostly for the realistic and tragic subject matter. It's appropriate for teens and up, but it's tricky to recommend. Anyone who lost a loved one or was personally effected by 9/11 in other ways may want to avoid this film, as some scenes may be very tough to handle, even 10 years later. This movie is powerful and quite sad.
On The Official Kid Critic Report Card, "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" gets a B+. I think it's one of the best films of the year and it definitely deserves a Best Picture Oscar nomination.
The Iron Lady (PG-13) B
From the title you might think "The Iron Lady" is the story of the wife of "Iron Man". And while Meryl Streep could probably pull-off that role too, here she stars as Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister.
Right from the first time Streep is on screen it's hard to recognize her because SHE IS Thatcher. And that convincing portrayal continues throughout the entire film. Much of the story of Thatcher's life is shown in flashbacks (Alexandra Roach plays Thatcher as a young girl). We see how she developed the drive to get to into politics, how she had to fight the men who ignored and dismissed her because of her gender and how she made it to the top.
Along with the flashbacks, director Phyllida Lloyd uses another device to provide some insight into Thatcher - her deceased husband Denis (played by Jim Broadbent). He's seen through hallucinations by the elderly Thatcher, and the couple carry on conversations and discuss events of the past. This choice by Lloyd shows Margaret as quite a different person from the one who was one of the most powerful leaders in the world during her time in office. The flashback scenes provide a look of Thatcher fighting hard for England against the odds and, at times, against everyone else. She's inspiring.
And Streep is amazing. Let's be honest - Meryl Streep should be nominated for just about every role she does and win an Oscar every time she's nominated. She is THE best actress working today - and nobody's a close second. But Academy voters, for some reason, like to give the honor most years to someone else - a surprising performance, a comeback performance, a newcomer. This is a shame. And it may happen again this year (as either Michelle Williams or Viola Davis could walk away with the Best Actress statue). We may be getting to the point where Streep should start receiving Lifetime Achievement Awards if she's not going to get the regular honors she deserves.
As for "The Iron Lady" itself, the flashback scenes are a little distracting during the first part of the film but settle down a bit later. There's a very authentic look to the film, highlighted by the wardrobes and the use of actual news footage of some of the historic events (though we never see the real Thatcher in any of them). All of the other performances are solid, but the story doesn't grab you as much as it should have. Frankly, I would have liked to have seen much more of Thatcher's exciting life when she was The Iron Lady and less of her as a sad, old lady.
"The Iron Lady" is rated PG-13 for some language and violence. It's appropriate for teens and up and, much like "J. Edgar", is a good choice for students who may be studying this time in world history.
On The Official Kid Critic Report Card, "The Iron Lady" gets a B. But it's a must-see for Streep's performance.
Joyful Noise (PG-13) C+
Normally, if a studio is unhappy or not confident in a movie, they'll bury it by releasing it in either January or August. Warner Bros. latest, "Joyful Noise", is one of the first new films of 2012, and while it does have some problems, it's not a complete loss - thanks to the music.
Queen Latifah co-produces and stars as ViRose Hill, the newly appointed director of a Gospel choir for a church in a small town in Georgia. Dolly Parton plays G.G., who's also a choir member. She wanted to be choir director so the two don't get along.
The town is in tough financial shape, and the one thing that brings everyone together and makes them happy is cheering for the choir as they take part each year in the national "Joyful Noise" competition. They've never made it to the finals - but this year could be different - thanks to ViRose's daughter (played by Keke Palmer) and G.G.'s grandson (Jeremy Jordan). They're both great singers who bring some young energy, and some young love, to the choir.
There are also several subplots, including one involving ViRose's son, who has Asperger's syndrome; her husband, who's in the military and a really weird one involving one of the choir members that doesn't even belong in this movie.
"Joyful Noise" needed some serious editing. The 120-minutes could easily have been cut-down to 95, and it would have made for a much better film. And much of what could have gone involves the songs. The film is divided almost equally between the story and musical numbers, some that are great and others that are totally unnecessary. And all of the songs are performed in their entirety, even ones not involving any of the main characters. Parton wrote three of the tunes and she and Latifah have plenty of opportunities to prove they can still sing (though Latifiah's solo midway through the film sadly brings everything to a stand still).
Palmer is the best singer of them all. Her version of Michael Jackson's "Man in the Mirror" at the beginning of the movie is tremendous.
From the commercials and the trailers you may think "Joyful Noise" is simply a musical/comedy, but the film does have some dramatic elements. And there are moments when it rises above the cheesy level where it exists most of the time. All of the acting is a little forced but I have to admit I did laugh a few times during the silly fight scene in the restaurant between Parton and Latifah, even though it's ridiculous.
"Joyful Noise" is rated PG-13 for language and brief adult content. Teens will like the young love story while fans of Parton will be thrilled to see her back on the big screen for the first time in 20-years. But the reason to see this movie is for the Gospel music. I'm sure there will be real choirs that will go see this movie and break out in song in the middle of the theater. Again, they're not all hits, but there's enough to make this at least a semi-joyful experience.
On The Official Kid Critic Report Card, "Joyful Noise" gets a C+.
Inspirational music overcomes an uninspired story.
Beauty and the Beast 3D (G) B+
"Beauty and the Beast 3D" was originally supposed to be released on February 12th, 2010. But after early test screenings and negative backlash, Disney decided to drop it completely. In September, they decided to release "The Lion King 3D". Once that became a surprise hit, the studio decided to re-release a bunch of their classics in the third dimension.
I got ripped online for my harsh criticisms of "The Lion King 3D" because of how poor the conversion was. Too many scenes were blurry, and for stretches of the movie, there was no 3D at all. But Disney has done it right with "Beauty and the Beast" - giving it the 3D treatment it deserves.
From the memorable opening sequence with the stain-glassed windows to the glorious finale, the 3D is used perfectly. At times the conversion makes the background images (such as the statues in the castle) pop-out and become true characters.
It also enhances many of the musical numbers including "Be Our Guest" and the ballroom sequence for the song "Beauty and the Beast". And there's a moment you'll remember if you're a fan of the movie - during the song "Gaston" when LeFou is swung straight into the camera. Wait till you see that in 3D.
It's no secret that "Beauty and the Beast" is my favorite movie of all time. So there is a part of me that isn't sure that this version was even necessary. Why mess with a classic? But if this version gets more people to see the film, especially young kids, then it was worth it. In fact this is a great first 3-D movie to take little ones to (theaters are even supplying special 3D glasses that are just the right size).
Along with this new version of "Beauty" is a brand new and very funny short called "Tangled Ever After", which takes place right where "Tangled" left off. And, as always, don't leave early because during the end credits there are new black and white artist sketches of the "Beauty" characters in 3D that are very impressive.
On The Official Kid Critic Report Card, "Beauty and the Beast 3D" gets a B+.
New on DVD
Trailers













